In a surprising twist to the ongoing royal saga, King Charles has issued a grave warning against the potential inclusion of more remote members into the Royal Family. The monarch’s cautious approach stems from concerns raised by royal commentator Angela Levin, who believes that bringing in individuals such as Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie could pose a risk if they maintain close ties with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
According to a report by Express, Levin expressed her reservations on GB News, emphasizing the delicate balance between theory and practice in integrating fringe members into official duties during the absence of the monarch and Princess Kate. The fear revolves around the possibility of leaks that could further complicate the already intricate dynamics within the Royal Family.
“I think it’s something that is okay in theory but, in practice, is quite hard. Can you trust people not to say too many things to the people in America [Meghan and Harry]? They have to be very careful because they don’t want anything leaked that will cause any more problems,” Levin cautioned.
King Charles, known for his efforts to streamline the monarchy, has only four working royals under the age of 65 – the Prince and Princess of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh. The limited pool of active members raises concerns about the monarchy’s ability to fulfill official duties, particularly in times of health-related setbacks.
While Queen Camilla continues to fulfill engagements, King Charles is currently undergoing hospital treatment for an enlarged prostate, and Princess Kate is in recovery from surgery at The London Clinic. This leaves a noticeable void in the roster of working royals, prompting the consideration of remote members for official roles.
Among the existing working royals, Princess Anne stands out for her no-nonsense, hard-working approach. However, concerns have been raised about the apparent frailty of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, as well as the Duke of Kent and Princess Alexandra.
The prospect of expanding the active roster to include more remote members becomes a potential solution to the current challenges. Still, the caution expressed by Angela Levin underscores the intricate nature of such a decision, particularly when considering the relationships between these individuals and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who currently reside in the United States.
As the royal family navigates this delicate situation, the eyes of the public remain fixed on the monarchy’s ability to adapt and maintain stability. The challenges posed by health-related absences highlight the need for a strategic approach to ensure the continuity of official duties and the preservation of the royal image.
In the coming weeks, the Royal Family’s decisions regarding the inclusion of remote members will undoubtedly shape the narrative surrounding the monarchy. King Charles’s warning serves as a reminder of the potential pitfalls in this endeavor, urging a careful and measured approach to safeguard the integrity of the Royal Family.
